Wizard People, Dear Reader. Talk: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film)Philosopher's Stone vs Sorcerer's Stone debate summary. The cast section was completely unnecessary, as it can be viewed in IMDB. The name alteration section pertains to the book primarily (because the movie follows the book). The music section is rather random, but if anyone feels the need to integrate it somewhere, here it is: The film features a score composed by John Williams, the fourth collaboration between the composer and director Chris Columbus. The score re- established John Williams as the top film composer, and leader of the leitmotif style. The score features many themes, the main theme, or Hedwig's Theme, being featured at the beginning of every Harry Potter film so far. Please do NOT make large edits unless you fully know what you are doing. If you want to remove something big please post it on the discussion. This is an encyclopedia and the cast list is included on nearly all major movies. Wizard People, Dear Reader was a recorded narration to be listened to alongside a muted DVD of the first Harry Potter film. Smart Serials; Clean Cracks; Top Downloads. Adobe Acrobat Pro; AutoCAD. Microsoft Foxpro 2.6 - DOS mode version. Just because it can be viewed on another site does not mean it shouldn't be listed here. The music section is not random and is also on most movie sections. Please post on the discussion before you make any drastic changes. There is no inconsistency, you're correct on that point. In the Book universe, one can see the Thestrals after they have witnessed and had time to understand a death. In the movie universe, it will be four years since Harry saw someone die, and never saw the Thestrals in the intervening time. Mr. Itty 1. 4: 4. Nov 2. 00. 4 (UTC)The fifth movie has been released, and Luna Lovegood explains about the Thestrals to Harry. She only says that, to see a Thestral, one must . But I think, beyond that, that one must see someone you care about dying, which would explain why Harry sees the Thestrals after Cedric died, and not after Quirrell died, 'cause he didn't care about Quirrell. The movie was released in America (pop. The naming conventions state that when naming an article of this nature, users are to ? It's a little confusing to see . I'm still not thrilled with the formatting of the page, as the three images are hard to place on the page without muddling everything up, so if you have any suggestions on better layouts, please be bold and implement them. The title was changed for the American market because the publishers thought that . Of course the substitution of . May 2. 00. 9 (UTC)The movie may of been paid for a developed by an American company, but the author, cast, crew are all British and it is set in Britain. So really, the proper name of Philosophers stone should remain. Only in America did the publishers change the name to Sorcerer's Stone. The rest of the world had Philosophers stone. Rowling is British, the story line is British, it was set in Britain, The actors are British and therefore it should be kept as the British name! Perhaps American protestors should direct their efforts into educating their countrymen more on classical ideas and literature, one could feebly hope. Life is short, but the years are long! Which is it? Alex 1. July 3. 0, 2. 00. About Us We are perfectly normal human mammals who just wish to. Lizard People, Dear Readers. Not affiliated with Brad Neely’s amazing Wizard People Dear Reader. The first thing to make clear about Brad Neely's Adult Swim series China, IL is that. Come and download wizard people dear reader absolutely for free. Dear Readers - Both versions, DVD ISO in Movies. Dear Readers, Wizard People! Wizard People, Dear Reader. Two versions of the CD set have. UTC)If memory serves (I unfortunately don't have the DVD here to check), he turned to a statue of ash that then crumbled, similar to (SPOILER FOR INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE! SPOILER AHEAD!) what happened to two vampires in the Interview with the Vampire movie. So he looked like a stone statue at first, but he was actually turned to ash like a person who'd been cremated. Did I just imagine this or did it really happen this way, I think I am right because my brother seemed to remember the same thing happening. Will 0. 2: 0. 5, 1. April 2. 00. 6 (UTC)While I would have liked to have seen it, I'm sorry to see Lee's commentary is never biased in the movies and he and Mc. Gonagall do not argue. Was Fullmetal Alchemist inspired by Harry Potter? The philosopher's stone is a legend that long predates these works of fiction. Someone is claiming that the Canadian release of the film is different from the US version. It comes down to the name of the stone. We all know that the book was originally 'Philosopher's stone' but for some reason the US call it the 'Sorcerer's Stone'. This editor from the WP,DR page states that the Canadian version has scenes added to it where the characters say Philosopher's instead of Sorcerer's, thus changing the length of the film, thus making WP,DR out of sync with the film. Can someone confirm with me that, in the US release, the characters definitely call the stone the Sorcerer's Stone? I think you are saying that, in the Canadian release, the movie was called Sorcerer's Stone but they say Philosopher's (which would be a hell of mistake). Can you explain yourself? The film scripts a quite Star Wars- like situation. This is more or less the same what what Palpatine says to Anakin after killing Mace Windu in SW: Ro. S. The HP1 book says nothing about resurrecting Harry's parents, why was this invented? JKR always emphasizies HP is not SW. The Resurrection Stone, presented in the seventh book, can do that. I think Voldemort said that just for Harry to give him the Stone. But the creators of the movie . I think Voldy was just trying to get Harry to give him the stone, and I think the movie writers were just trying to illustrate his attempts. They changed a lot, obviously. I have a feeling the movie creators only intended that line to be for that purpose, not to make any strange allusions or guesses to any later books. But then again, I don't know. Agelseb (talk) 2. May 2. 00. 8 (UTC). Star Wars Revenge of the Sith came out after the HP1 movie. Jammy (talk) 1. 5: 1. May 2. 00. 8 (UTC)Japanese seiy. Anyone know what happened? Skittle 1. 9: 1. 8, 1. July 2. 00. 7 (UTC)And almost exactly half of them are pages written by some Brian Linder. How has this happened? Skittle 1. 9: 2. 1, 1. July 2. 00. 7 (UTC)Because they just are? Is there really any problem, what sentences do you exactly mean. And yes the references are written by Brian Linder.. Gran. 2 1. 9: 2. 3, 1. July 2. 00. 7 (UTC)I was just wondering if it was just because it was handy, or if there weren't other sources that said the same. It would probably be better to use something more definate where possible; for example, rather than speculation that filming might be taking place at London Zoo, and that it will probably be for the scene with the snake, if we could find something saying that filming of that scene took place at London Zoo. Skittle 2. 2: 5. 7, 1. July 2. 00. 7 (UTC)U. S. Whoever put in the article that it was released here on December 5, 2. Regardless, this is a pretty discreditable and embarrassing error for Wikipedia and I'm quite surprised that no one has changed or even brought this up yet, so I did. July 2. 00. 7 (UTC)(the same person who replied to Reginmund's comment above starting with . I saw the film at the midnight release, one of the first of its kind in the wee hours of Friday, November 1. I am going to provide sources.. Here are my suggestions for improvement: The article needs a . Material for this section can be found in the work of film scholars and film reviewers. The article needs a . Currently, only the soundtrack is discussed. The lead is not a standalone summary of the article (see WP: LEAD for hints on writing leads). The article needs to be copy edited. The major problems are: Repetitive diction (as in . It dominates the first part of the article and gives very little information for its size. The . If the only information in the sentence is that so- and- so was cast as a particular character, it doesn't need to be there - the . Only include interesting information beyond that in the . List only the interesting and important locations, not every single one. This would probably work better as a list or table, actually. Try to make coherent paragraphs that focus on particular topics. The . That is a very vague number and not considered a reliable source for an encyclopedia. The . I would assume that every major movie critic around the world commented on this film. The current selection seems US- centric and thin. Also, more world- wide numbers on the film would be helpful; it was not only seen in the US. There is no need of Cinematic Style as this is not an FA nom. Prose Lists: All is fine. Language: OK right now. Vikrant Phadkay 1. September 2. 00. 7 (UTC)Thanks! Gran. 2 1. 4: 5. 1, 2. September 2. 00. 7 (UTC)I could be rong, but insn't Rawlings book about Sourcers, not Philosiphers? Gran. 2 2. 0: 1. 7, 2. October 2. 00. 7 (UTC)Different running times. I think 1. 52 is for Sorcerer's Stone . Because of differences between the PAL frame rate (2. PAL standard. In the book Harry doesn't actually kill him (or at least Dumbledore gives that impression as he places the blame on Voldemort) but in the film Harry directly (if unintentionally) kills Quirrell by touching his face. I have added this to the article. January 2. 00. 8 (UTC)Although I know its true, unfortunately it can only be included if it is verified with a reliable source. Gran. 2 2. 1: 1. 6, 9 January 2. UTC)I concur; there will always be differences between the source material and its adaptation. The way to avoid making an indiscriminate listing of differences is to rely on independent verification, as Gran stated above. We can't purport to state that this particular difference or that particular difference is appropriate for the encyclopedic context of an article. If you're interested in including how the fate of Quirrell differed, try searching for a reliable source that makes that connection, and it could be discussed here to see if the connection is worthwhile. While we wouldn't want this section to become bloated beyond recognition, WP: IINFO states that articles shouldn't be: Plot- only description of fictional works, Lyrics databases, Excessive listing of statistics, News reports, Who's whos, or FAQs. Nothing about noting differences between two versions of the same story (i.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |